Another lazy Sunday afternoon, thinking I should be gardening, blogging or doing something more useful, and then I opened The Observer, my Sunday paper of choice, to find a picture of a village I’d visited back in 2004, and I shot awake.
The village was Civita di Bagnoregio and there was a whole page article (well, almost a whole page) about the place which, when we’d been there was deserted, save for a few cats and the charming owner of a small, inky-dark, Bodega into which we’d wandered. It was June and there were blazing logs in the open fireplace. Deserted wasn’t the word to describe the village. It was the sort of place you felt you would want to leave come sundown as ghosts seemed to haunt its medieval streets.
What has brought about the article in today’s paper is the fact that Civita has become the first area in Italy to charge tourists for visiting. Venice, where marches against tourism are a regular event, may care to take a lesson from the Mayor, Francesco Bigiotti, who made the decision to charge visitors for accessing the footbridge to the town in 2013 when the charge was 1.50 Euros, raised to 3 Euros this year with 5 Euros on Sundays.
Not only does this small fee enable the mayor to monitor the numbers entering the hamlet, it has also meant that communal taxes have been abolished in Civita and nearby Bagnoregio (pop.3,650) of which he is also Mayor, but it has provided much-needed employment. In fact, the town has zero unemployment now. Four hundred jobs have been created via two hundred new tourism-linked businesses that have emerged in the past few years. And there’s more: there is now transport for disabled local people and an improved health service. With an estimated 850 visitors due this year, the charge has obviously not had a detrimental effect on tourism.
Back in 2004, our party of nine people had been staying at a nearby agriturismo farmhouse in Aquapendiente in Italy’s Lazio region, and one of the places recommended for a visit with our hire car had been Civita. There is no access for cars so visitors must be prepared for the walk across the sloping footbridge. We’d visited Orvieto, Siena and other surrounding towns and this fascinating cobble-stoned village built high on a plateau of volcanic rock surrounded by steep ravines promised to be a complete contrast.
Lying approximately 74 miles north of Rome Civita was founded by the Etruscans nearly 2,500 years ago and its year-round population is only 10 people. It was known as ‘the dying town’ due to floods, landslides and earthquakes that constantly threaten its survival. In 2014 and 2015, some of the old properties plunged into the ravine when the sides of the outcrop on which they were built gave way.
Once at the top of the footbridge, you are faced with a huge stone gateway, the entrance, through which you arrive at the main Piazza which contains a 12th-century church with a bell tower. Off this are meticulously maintained streets of old stone houses, some of which have now been turned into holiday homes. At sunset the stones glow golden, softening the aspect of what could seem fortress-like.
I have no hesitation in recommending Civita as a perfect day-trip from any of the neighbouring towns, Siena, Orvieto, even Rome or Florence, if you have transport and are willing to hike up to the village, but remember, there is no post office, supermarket, chemist, doctor or hospital.
The site is under consideration to be given world heritage status by UNESCO and two important names from the world of cinema are backing this, Oscar-winning composer Ennio Morricone and director Bernardo Bertolucci. But even if it is not successful, the outlook seems positive for Civita which will live once again, thanks to a tax on tourism.
Now, let’s see Venice do likewise.
I acknowledge, with thanks, the information on the Mayor’s initiatives which I got from the article by Angela Giuffrida in The Observer of 20th August 2017, on p.21
The photographs are mine all dating from 2004.
Your pictures of Civita are marvelous, Mari. Interesting about the tourist tax and how it has helped the community. I’m always happy to pay for a place if it keeps tourist numbers down and helps the locals. I agree, Venice should also do the same. I hope Venice is doing well now during the pandemic, with big cruise ships now on the outs. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Venice would be as rich as it was at its heights if it charged tourists, Mari, but no bad thing. 🙂 🙂 This looks a captivating village.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am always happy to pay to visit places that really interest me and that need the money to preserve it. I wish they would charge in Split, Croatia, where Game of Thrones fans completely ruined my visit there last year, crowding the steps and the rooms of Diocletian’s Palace. I gave up trying to see, or feel, anything there.
I managed some photographs but all filled with people thronging about. It rankles me still.
LikeLike
The way I see it, you’re paying to use the footbridge, rather than visit the village, which I think is fair enough. I’d love to go … and I’d have a super-monster memory card in my camera!
LikeLiked by 1 person
If only the civic authorites would grow the you-knwo-whats to do something like this. But, could they control the corruption that seems to dog that city?
Civita was on my list earler this year, but an unscheduled accident sent me home to Australia far too soon. Next time …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, I know. If they would even stop the cruise ships coming in in such numbers their problem would be halved. I have young family who want to visit but I tell them “Go in winter: yes, it’s cold, but at least you’ll see Venice”. I think Civita has done it properly and having to pay to go in, they should attract only those who really want to visit it for what it is, not to just tick a box.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi. Fascinating post. I wonder if they have any b&bs or any way to stay in Civita. (I think the third photo from the bottom is Strasbourg, France, though. :))
LikeLiked by 1 person
Marie, thanks for picking up on the photo. I was having a lot of trouble with technology yesterday when I uploaded them (IPad not responding, TV recorder not responding, my PC slowed down) and I’m off today to Italy, so I must have got mixed up with some I already had on the desktop window. Have now removed it and will find the correct one. Thanks again, it’s people like you I need.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No problem. I recognized Strasbourg because I was there last December and have a shot in almost the exact same spot. 🙂
LikeLike